Prince Harry's Fight for Taxpayer-Provided Police Protection Hits a Wall — While Taylor Swift Enjoys 'Rare' State-Funded VIP Security in London

Taxpayer-funded police escorts and security in Britain are typically only granted to senior royals and high-level British politicians, but "the world's most famous woman" Taylor Swift just broke all those rules.

The "London Boy" singer sparked controversy involving Prince Harry and left-wing Labour Party politicians after receiving a blue-light escort to Wembley Arena for her August Eras Tour shows.

The Duke of Sussex lost a High Court bid to retain his taxpayer-funded security in Britain for himself and his family. In documents released from the case, which was decided on Wednesday, February 28, the fifth in line to the throne even demanded the name of the specific person who signed off on stripping Sussex protection four years ago.

But when it comes to a celebrity, even one as famous as Swift, getting a service primarily in place for British royalty, the rebel prince has some defenders in his corner.

"Police should be left alone to make operational decisions," former Metropolitan Police Commander John O'Connor shared. "This interference creates a perception there is no such thing as a free lunch or concert tickets. The Met is unable to provide security for Prince Harry but he must be in at least as much danger as Taylor Swift."

He added that the "Style" singer's VIP treatment was "an abuse of an elite service."

"What then is 'elite' and that word definitely describes Taylor who brings so much joy to people," a commenter on X stated. "What do the Duke and Duchess of D------ and grimy politicians bring to people but negativity?"

Harry and Meghan Markle defender Dr. Shola Mos-Shogbamimu told an outlet, "The same grounds that exist for giving her protection are the same grounds that exist for giving Prince Harry protection, especially since his reasons are long-standing."

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex decided to leave the United Kingdom ("Megxit") in early 2020 for reasons that have been disputed by both analysts and the couple themselves ever since. No matter the reason behind the parting, government-funded royal security is something that is only granted to senior royals who actively work for or from the annual Sovereign Grant of public money.

It is understood, "obviously," that such monarchy members will reside full-time in Britain and will continue their public and private duties as representatives of the reigning monarch. Both of these principles were abandoned when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex decided to leave.

The fiery-haired prince filed a claim against the British Home Office after they decided to remove such security in February 2020, and released a statement defending his decision in December 2023.

GBN reported on Harry's protection.